Nominee
Project
Role Type
Criteria
I, Gerd, want to hand over my PL of the S-CORE project to Tom - Thomas Fleischmann (thomasfleischmann).
The process demands, that he becomes committer first.
He is driving our engagement for S-CORE from Accenture side,
is member of the Eclipse SDV X-Core Platform Council, elected to the SDV WG Steering committee and speaks on conferences as ambassador for S-CORE.
In Eclipse S-CORE he started to write the Feature request Security & Crypto.
Nominated by
Date
-
Status
This election failed due to a veto from the PMC.
| Voter | Vote | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Gerd Schaefer | +1 | +1 implied by nomination |
| Philipp Ahmann | +1 | |
| Markus Schu | +1 | |
| Johannes Glamsch | +1 | |
| Dan Calavrezo | +1 | |
| Lars Bauhofer | +1 | |
| Armin Bartsch | +1 | |
| Holger Grandy | +1 | |
| Frank Scholter Peres | +1 |
PMC Approval
- Andy Riexinger (-1) Dear Tom, the Automotive PMC rejected the committer election, as we see not too many contributions in the S-CORE repo. We refer also to the mail of Wayne Beaton, Director of Open Source Projects, Eclipse Foundation and to his blog post: "To be considered for committer status a candidate must demonstrate merit. Generally, this takes the form of making high-quality contributions to a project in the form of patches or new code, but can manifest in other ways. It may make sense, for example, to nominate a committer based on a history of helping users and adopters." Source: https://blog.waynebeaton.ca/posts/opensource/hired-a-committer/ Have also a look into the Eclipse Project Handbook: https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#elections-committer Keep on going with your work in the S-CORE project and feel free to restart the election with additional evidence.