Nominee
Project
Role Type
Criteria
Brendan has made an significant impact on the project.
Since the start of the project he was constantly contributing to the repositories communication and baselibs to solve numerous bugs and provide new functionality. His commits always followed the highest standards of code quality which enables to use the software in safety related context. Currently he´s working on the implementation of method for MW::COM
https://github.com/eclipse-score/communication/commits/main/?author=bem…
It is my pleasure to nominate Brendan as a committer on Eclipse Safe Open Vehicle Core.
Nominated by
Date
-
Status
This election failed due to a veto from the PMC.
| Voter | Vote | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Jochen Hönle | +1 | +1 implied by nomination |
| Jan Schlosser | +1 | |
| Philipp Ahmann | 0 | |
| Ulrich Huber | +1 | |
| Lukasz Tekieli | +1 | |
| Anton Krivoborodov | +1 | |
| Alexander Schemmel | +1 | |
| Markus Bechter | +1 | |
| Andrey Babanin | +1 | |
| Alexander Lanin | 0 | Lots of commits, but I cannot judge quality/contributions as it affects a totally different area than where I'm working in. |
| Dan Calavrezo | 0 | |
| Armin Bartsch | +1 |
PMC Approval
- Andy Riexinger (-1) Dear Brendan, the Automotive PMC rejected the committer election, as we see not the typical workflow according to the Eclipse Project Handbook in your contributions the S-CORE repo. (https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#contributing) Means, we expect Pull Requests authored by you, which merges your contributions into the main path. To be considered for committer status a candidate must demonstrate merit. Generally, this takes the form of making high-quality contributions to a project in the form of patches or new code, but can manifest in other ways. Keep on going with your work in the S-CORE project and feel free to restart the election with additional evidence, like links to your PR´s.