Christoph "Schorsch" Jung (GitHub Username: drcgjung, Eclipse Username: drcgjung) is an active member, software engineer, and architect in the Knowledge Agent team. He joined Catena-X in August 2021 where he first contributed valuable integration efforts for the "Speed-Boat" and "Rohrputzer" prototypes.
He helped to boostrap the Semantic Layer (initial contributions to DTR)
before proposing and demonstrating a complementary compute-to-data architecture,
standard, reference implementations and KIT which adheres to the high
eclipse-tractusx standards (TRGs, security audits, compliance and interoperability issues):
https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/knowledge-agents/issues?q=is%3Aclos…+
https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/knowledge-agents-edc/issues?q=is%3A…+
https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/eclipse-tractusx.github.io/pull/374
Currently he increasingly helps other teams to adopt that technology in their KITs, pursues necessary fixes
as well as consults new features in that area
https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/eclipse-tractusx.github.io/pull/380
https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/knowledge-agents-edc/issues?q=is%3A…
https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/knowledge-agents-edc/issues/46
https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/knowledge-agents-aas-bridge
It is my pleasure to nominate Christoph Jung as a committer on Eclipse Tractus-X.
| Voter | Vote | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Werner Jost | +1 | +1 implied by nomination |
| Gábor Almádi | +1 | |
| Martin Rohrmeier | +1 | |
| Jan Kreutzfeld | 0 | |
| Carsten Lenz | -1 | I'm not in doubt of tecnical skills but in following our project specifics (e.g. TRGs, where to handle what (Eclipse-TractusX vs Catena-X consortia)). Although he made progress (kudos!) he didnt reach the maturity level we need. Also I'm unhappy with the examples the committer election provides: - PR eclipse-tracutsx/eclipse-tractux.github.io/#380: I'm unable to determine Christophs contribution - mentionend repo eclipse-tractusx/knowledge-agents-aas-bridge doesn't contain any contribution at all I'm sorry. |
| Siegfried Kiermayer | -1 | The contributions provided do not convince me that you contributed enough and show a good understanding of expected workflows: one link is a issue search with issues not relevant to you. One link is a repository. I have not seen any indepth discussions or references to TRGs. |
| Daniel Miehle | -1 | I support the assessment of Carsten and Sigi. |
| Jaro Hartmann | 0 | |
| Fabian Grün | -1 | I also agree to the statements from Sigi and Carsten. |
| Sebastian Scherer | +1 | Can't think of a better committer. He clearly has the technical know-how we need. |
| Tom Meyer | 0 | I understand the others' assessments, but there are TRGs mentioned. Most of the search commits are related to "TRG fixing" and quality increase, which is fine. Also implementations regarding the security assessment have been contributed. Sometimes I saw some light swearwords in commits or PRs (like "fix this shit") which are not needed. As one -1 is sufficient to fail I propose to rerun the election soon with more explicit examples of your contributions :) |
| Malte Hellmeier | 0 |