Nominee
Project
Role Type
Criteria
Hereby, we nominate Max Heimbrock for an Eclipse Committer Election.
Max has greatly contributed to the openpass project through the increase of code quality and applying clean code principles:
- https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipse/openpass/gt-gen-core/-/merge_request…
- https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipse/openpass/gt-gen-core/-/merge_request…
As part of the developer team for simulation at BMW, Max is utilizing and contributing to openpass on a daily basis. More details about his activities can be found here: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/maxhei
It is my pleasure to nominate Max Heimbrock as a committer on Eclipse openPASS.
Nominated by
Date
-
Status
This election failed due to a veto from the PMC.
| Voter | Vote | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Arun Das | +1 | +1 implied by nomination |
| Xiao Pan | +1 | |
| Tuan Duong Quang | +1 | |
| Andreas Rauschert | +1 | |
| Uwe Woessner | +1 | |
| Jupp Tscheak | +1 |
PMC Approval
- Andy Riexinger (-1) Dear Max, the Automotive PMC rejected the committer election, as we see not too many contributions in the openPASS repo. See blog post of Wayne Beaton, Director of Open Source Projects, Eclipse Foundation: To be considered for committer status a candidate must demonstrate merit. Generally, this takes the form of making high-quality contributions to a project in the form of patches or new code, but can manifest in other ways. It may make sense, for example, to nominate a committer based on a history of helping users and adopters. Source: https://blog.waynebeaton.ca/posts/opensource/hired-a-committer/ Have also a look into the Eclipse Project Handbook: https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#elections-committer Keep on going with your work in the openPASS project and feel free to restart the election with additional evidence.