Nominee
Project
Role Type
Criteria
Jeroen is currently our main guy at ADLINK working op cyclone dds, he has taken over this role from Maurits de Jong who left the company
Nominated by
Date
-
Status
This election failed due to a veto from the PMC.
| Voter | Vote | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Michiel Beemster | +1 | +1 implied by nomination |
| Erik Boasson | +1 | |
| Hans van t Hag | +1 | |
| Angelo Corsaro | +1 | Allez Jeroen! |
PMC Approval
- Kai Kreuzer (-1) This nomination does not fulfill the rules for new committer nominations. As Jens Reimann stated on the iot-pmc list: I do have a bit of a problem with this nomination. As the Eclipse Handbook says about committer elections [1]: --- There must not be any hint of "we (company W) hired person X to work on project Y thus person X should elected a committer". Committer status is independent of employment; thereare well-supported mechanisms for contributors without commit-rights and thus Committer status is not required for a team member to be effective. Additionally, the team will want to make sure that they have confidence in the candidate irrespective of employment and management because the committer status will continue even after moves to another job. --- So I think it would be helpful to explain why Jeroen has earned the trust of the project, provide some references like code or other contributions to the project.